x
J
L
E
S
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VALUES BETWEEN MADRASAH AND GENERAL STUDENTS: A STUDY ON RAJSHAHI DIVISION
By: Kazi Imrul Kayesh, Sabina Sultana, Md. Mobarak Hossain
Key Words: Values, Madrasah students, General students
JLES-Vol-13-No-P-17-22, December 2018
AbstractThe purpose of the study was to investigate the differences in values of the students between Madrasah and General Institutions in Rajshahi Division, Bangladesh. To investigate and compare the values among the students, 120 respondents (60 from Madrasah and 60 from General institutions) were selected by purposive sampling method from the target population. In order to measure the personal values an adapted Bangla version (Latif 1991) of Allport-Vernon-Lindzey study of values was administered on the respondents. Six hypotheses were formulated in this study. The data were analyzed by using t-tests. The findings revealed that there were significant differences in theoretical, economic, social, political and religious values between the two groups of students. But there were no significant differences in aesthetic values between the respondents.
Allport GW, Vernon PE and Lindzey G 1960. Manual of Study of Values (3rd edn). Boston: Houghton Mifflin & Co.
Allport GW and Vernon PE 1931. A Study of Values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin & Co.
Ball-Rokeach SJ, Rokeach M and Grube JW 1986. The great American values test: Influencing behavior and belief through television.Oxford Academic J. S. Fors. 65: 571-573. Begum HA 1985. Cross cultural study of interpersonal Values.
Dhaka Univ. Stud. 12 (2): 113-120.
Benedict R 1934. Pattern of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin & Co.
Chatterjee J 1991. Personal Project correlates of life satisfaction in Bangladesh and Canada: A social ecological analysis. Bangladesh Psychol. Stud. 1(2): 83-101.
Eaton TV and Giacomino DE 2001. An examination of personal values: Differences between accounting students and managers and differences genders. Teaching Business Ethics 5: 213-229.
Eaton TV and Giacomino DE 2000. Personal values of business studies: Differences by gender and discipline. Res. Accounting Ethics 7: 83-102.
England GW 1975. The manager and his values: An international perspective from the United States, Japan, Korea, India and Australia, Cambridge. J. Busi. 50(1): 5-67.
Erikson EH 1963.Childhood and Society (2nd edn.). New York: Norton.
Finegan J 1994. The impact of personal values on judgments of ethical behavior in the work place. J. Busi. Ethics 13: 747- 755.
Freud S 1949. An Outline of Psychoanalysis (J: Strachey, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1940).
Fritzsche DJ 1995. Personal values: Potential keys to ethical decision making. J. Busi. Ethics 14: 909-922.
Guth W Tagiuri R 1965. Personal values and corporate strategies.
Harvard Busi. Rev. 43: 123-132.
Haque M and Mozumder MK 2000. Relationship of values between two Generations. Bangladesh J. Psychol. 18: 97.
Hossain MA Rahman MS and Sultana N 2013. Acomparative studies of values between college and madrasah students of Chittagong city. Chittagong Univ. J. Busi. Sci. 6(1 and 2): 87-95.
Kandel DB and Lesser GS 1973.Youth in two worlds: United States and Denmark. San Francisco; Jossey-Bass. Oxford Academic J. S. Force 52: 140-141
Karim AKMR and Rahman H 2001.Education system-linked differences in basic areas of value system. Dhaka Univ. J. Psychol. 25: 57-64.
Karim SF 1990. Adolescents: A cross cultural study of political values. Dhaka Univ. J. Psychol. 16: 38-45.
Kelly EL Fiske DW 1950. The prediction of success in the
V.A. Training program in Clinical Psychol. 19: 53-79.
Khanam M 1993. A comparison of the expressed moral values ofHindu and Muslim students of Dhaka University. Dhaka Univ. J. Psychol. 18: 55-59.
Latif MA 1991. Adaptation of Allport-Vernon-Lindzey study of values for use in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Psychol. 12: 24-30.
Mead M 1935. Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. N.Y.: William Marrow & Co. Inc.
Moeed MA Murshed SM 1986. University education and change of values. Bangladesh J. Psychol. 9: 54-60.
Muhammad N and Latif MA 2010. Personal value system as related to anti minority attitude in Muslim students of Rajshahi University, Bangladesh. J. Life Earth Sci. 5: 85- 89.
Mussen PH Conger J and Kagan J 1974. Child development and personality, N.Y. Harper and Row.
Page MH and Washington ND 1986. Family proverbs and value transmission of single black mothers. J. S. Psychol. 127(1): 49-58.
Rahman MA Wadud N 1983. Value differences of incoming and outgoing students of Dhaka University. Dhaka Univ. J. Psychol. 13: 39-43.
Rokeach M 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York, Free Press.
Singhapakdi A and Vitell SJ 1993. Personal and professional values underlying the ethical judgments of marketers. J. Busi. Ethics 12: 525-533.
Smith MB 1949. Personal values as determinants of a political attitude. J. Psychol. 27: 477-486.
Spranger E 1928. Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality (trans. from the 5th German ed. by P.J.W. Pigors) Halle, Germany; Niemyer.
Super DE and Sverko B 1995. Life Roles, Values and Careers.
San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Zaman FTZ and Muhammad N 2012. A comparative study of the values of Bangladeshi male students in public and private universities. ASA Univ. Rev. 6(1): 33-42.
Zaman S 1973. Changes of values. Dhaka Univ. Stud. 21: 141- 163.
Manuscript received on 19.11.2018 and revised on 09.07.2019
Kazi Imrul Kayesh, Sabina Sultana, Md. Mobarak Hossain
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VALUES BETWEEN MADRASAH AND GENERAL STUDENTS: A STUDY ON RAJSHAHI DIVISION
JLES-Vol-13-No-P-17-22, December 2018
https://jlescience.com/les-publish/a-comparative-study-of-values-between-madrasah-and-general-students-a-study-on-rajshahi-division/Copyright © 2022
By Authors and Journal of Life and Earth Science (JLES)
https://jlescience.com