x
J L E S

EFFECTS OF CROWDED LIVING ON MENTAL HEALTH

By: Mst. Sumsun Nahar Biswas, Md. Shariful Islam, Shiri Farhana

Key Words: Crowded Living, Mental Health, Residential Status

JLES-Vol-18-No-P-119-122, December 2023.

Abstract

The study was aimed to investigate the mental health of student of  Rajshahi University as function of their family structure, present residential status and permanent residential status. The main objectives of the study were (1) to study the effect of family structure (joint family and nuclear family) on mental health (2) to study the effect of present residential status issue (dormitory and room) on mental health and (3) to study the effect of permanent residential status (urban and rural) on mental health. Here, three hypotheses were framed. The first hypothesis stated that the student of nuclear family would had better mental health than the student of joint family. The second hypothesis stated that the student of residing at room would have better mental health than the student of dormitory. The third hypothesis stated that the student of urban would had better mental health than the student of rural. The independent variables used in this study were present residential status, family structure and permanent residential status. Each independent variable had two levels such as dormitory/room, joint family /nuclear family and urban/rural respectively. The amount of Mental Health expressed by different comparison groups was the dependent variable. Here, 200 respondents were purposively selected from university students and were stratified into dormitory and room, joint family and nuclear family, and urban and rural. The study used General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) originally developed by Goldberg (1978) adapted by (Iliyas and Ayesha, 2001). A factorial design was used in this study. To analyze the collected data, mean, standard deviation, t-test were applied. Which confirm our 1st hypothesis. The findings on family structure in the present study showed that respondents of nuclear family had better mental health than respondents of joint family. These findings had supported to the first hypothesis of the present study. The finding on present residential status in the present study showed that respondents residing at room had better mental health than the respondents of dormitory. These findings had supported to the second hypothesis of the present study. The findings on permanent residential status in the present study showed that respondents of urban family had better mental health than respondents of rural family. These findings had supported to the third hypothesis of the present study.

Beiser M Hou F 2001. Language acquisition, unemployment and depressive disorder among Southeast Asian refugees: a 10-year study. Soc Sci Med. 53(10):1321–1334. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00412-3.

Keyes CL 2002. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 43(2), 207-222.

Keyes CL and Simoes EJ 2012. To flourish or not: Positive mental health and all-cause  mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11), 2164-2172.

Silove D Steel Z Bauman A Chey T McFarlane A 2007. Trauma, PTSD and the longer-term mental health burden amongst Vietnameserefugees. SocPsychiatryPsychiatrEpidemiol. 42(6):467–476. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0194-z.

World Health Organization. 2012. Mental health. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/mental-health

World Health Organization 2014. GAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. The Lancet, vii, 83 -128.

Gibson M Petticrew M Bambra C Sowden AJ Wright KE Whitehead M 2011. Housing and health inequalities: a synthesis of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at different pathways linking housing and health. Health Place. 17(1):175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.09.011.

Evans GW Wells NM Moch A 2003. Housing and mental health: a review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. JSocIss. 59(3):475–500. doi: 10.1111/15404560.00074.

Krieger J Higgins DL 2002. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health. 92(5):758–768. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.5.758.

Gove WR Hughes M Galle OR 1983. Overcrowding in the household: an analysis of determinants and effects. New York: Academic Press.

Suglia SF Duarte CS Sandel MT 2011. Housing quality, housing instability, and maternal mental health. J Urban Health. 88(6):1105–1116. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9587-0.

Evans GW Saegert S Harris R 2001. Residential density and psychological health among children in low-income families. Environ Behav. 33(2):165–180. doi: 10.1177/00139160121972936.

Regoeczi WC 2008. Crowding in context: an examination of the differential responses of men and women to high-density living environments∗ J Health SocBehav. 49(3):254–268. doi: 10.1177/002214650804900302.

Goldberg DP Gater R Sartorius N Ustun TB Piccinelli M Gureje O Rutter C 1997. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 27(1):191–197. doi: 10.1017/S003329179600424

Mst. Sumsun Nahar Biswas, Md. Shariful Islam, Shiri Farhana

EFFECTS OF CROWDED LIVING ON MENTAL HEALTH

JLES-Vol-18-No-P-119-122, December 2023.

https://jlescience.com/les-publish/effects-of-crowded-living-on-mental-health/

Copyright © 2023
By Authors and Journal of Life and Earth Science (JLES)
http://localhost/jles-journals