x
J L E S

STUDY OF COMBINING ABILITY AND COMPONENTS OF VARIATION OF YIELD OF SOME LENTIL LINES

By: Anuradha Roy Chowdhury and Anil Chandra Deb

Key Words: Half diallel cross, combining ability, yield contributing characters, Lentil.

JLES-Vol-11-No-P-33-38-, December 2016

Abstract

This study was conducted with fifteen crosses and six parents of Lens culinaris Medic. to reveal the general combining ability, specific combining ability and components of vatiations and their ratios. The variation due to general combining ability (gca) was found to be significant for days to flower, plant height at first flower, canopy area at maximum flower and root weight indicated that additive gene actions played significant role for the expression of these characters. The highly positive sca estimations were recorded in the cross, P1×P2 for number of secondary branches at first flower, pod weight per plant, seed weight per plant and root weight and the cross P1×P3 for canopy area at maximum flower, number of secondary branches at maximum flower, number of pods per plant and individual plant weight were indicated as good specific combiners. In F1 generation, the component D was significant for days to flower, plant height at first flower, number of primary branches at first flower and canopy area at maximum flower. The values of F were non significant for all the characters except number of primary branches at first flower indicating that equal amount of dominant and recessive genes were present in the parents of F1 generation. Two dominant components of variance, H1 was significant for canopy area at maximum flower and H2 for days to flower, number of primary branches at first flower and canopy area at maximum flower. The ratios of [(H1/D)]1/2 suggested that over dominance was found for number of secondary branches at first flower, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant, individual plant weight and root weight. The ratio, (4DH1)1/2+F/(4DH1)1/2-F revealed that the values of the ratio were more than one recorded in canopy area at maximum flower , number of secondary branches at maximum flower, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant and root weight indicating the presence of an excess of dominant genes in the parents. The ratio, h2/H2 showed that only one group of genes controlled the eleven characters except plant height at first flower and two groups of genes controlled plant height at first flower. The highest value of heritability was obtained for plant height at first flower (0.495144).

Ahmed MS 2002. Genetics of fruit set and related traits in tomato (Lycoperson esculentum) under hot humid condition. Ph.D.Thesis. BSMRAU, Gazipur, Dhaka.

Ara R 2010. Genetic study on yield and some of the yield contributing characters of onion (Allium cepa L.). Ph.D. Thesis. Rajshahi University.

Arunga EE, Rheenen HAV and Owuoche JO 2010. Diallel analysis of Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties for important traits. African J. Agril. Res. 5(15): 1951-1957.

Gowda, GLL and Bahl PN 1978. Combining ability in chickpea.

Indian J. Genetics and Plant Breeding 98(2): 245-257.

Griffing B 1956. Concepts of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 463- 493.

Hayman BI 1954a. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39: 789-809.

Hayman BI 1954b. The analysis of variance of diallel table. Biometrics

10: 235-244.

Jinks JL 1954. The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica L. varieties. Genetics 39: 767-788.

Jinks JL 1956. The F2 and backcross generations from a set of diallel crosses. Heredity 10: 1-30.

Khaleque, MA 1975. Studies on quantitative characters in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ph.D. Thesis. Rajshahi University.

Mandal N, Roy K and Gupta S 1998. Nature of genetic control of submergence tolerance in rice. Indian J. Genet. 58 (3): 285-290.

Mather K 1949. Biometrical Genetics (1st eds.). Mathuen and Co. Ltd.London.

Mather K and Jinks JL 1971. Biometrical Genetic (2nd edn.).Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.

Milkova L and Petkova I 1979.1nheritance of plant height in red pepper. Genetika – i-Selektsiya 12(5): 315-320.

Paul NK, Joarder OI and Eunus AM 1976 a. Analysis of yield and some of its components in mustard. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 46(11): 517-524.

Singh IP and Singh JD 2007. Genetics of yield and its components in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). National J.Plant Improv., 9(1): 29-31.

Singh RK and Chaudhary BD 1976. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. International Bioscience Publishers, Hissar (India).

Singh RK and Chaudhary BD 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Revised Edition, Kalyani Publishers, pp. 102-157.

Subramanian A and Subbaraman N 2006. Genetic analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J. Agric. Res. 40 (3):195-199.

Swarup I, Goswami HK and Lal MS 1991. Genetic analysis of yield and its contributing characters in lentil [Lens culinaris]. Lens Newletter, 18(1-2): 7-11.

Syamal MH and Joshi AK 1997. Genetics of number of seeds in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller). Veg. Sci. 24 (l): 39-42.

Tabassum MI and Saleem M 1993. Study of gene action for economic characters in maize. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 3(2): 209-211.

Anuradha Roy Chowdhury and Anil Chandra Deb

STUDY OF COMBINING ABILITY AND COMPONENTS OF VARIATION OF YIELD OF SOME LENTIL LINES

JLES-Vol-11-No-P-33-38-, December 2016

https://jlescience.com/les-publish/study-of-combining-ability-and-components-of-variation-of-yield-of-some-lentil-lines/

Copyright © 2022
By Authors and Journal of Life and Earth Science (JLES)
https://jlescience.com